Development, Getting it off my chest

On capitalism, consumerism, and Fake Steve Jobs

I am appalled that I 100% agree with something Fake Steve Jobs said today.

We all know that there’s no fucking way in the world we should have microwave ovens and refrigerators and TV sets and everything else at the prices we’re paying for them. There’s no way we get all this stuff and everything is done fair and square and everyone gets treated right. No way. And don’t be confused — what we’re talking about here is our way of life. Our standard of living. You want to “fix things in China,” well, it’s gonna cost you. Because everything you own, it’s all done on the backs of millions of poor people whose lives are so awful you can’t even begin to imagine them, people who will do anything to get a life that is a tiny bit better than the shitty one they were born into, people who get exploited and treated like shit and, in the worst of all cases, pay with their lives.

I believe in capitalism. Sometimes, I even believe in free market capitalism. I believe people should be able to buy what luxury they can afford.

I also believe that consumption is only a sustainable lifestyle choice for the West because everyone else is locked out of it.

It is a very useful exercise to ask yourself, “What if everyone lived like I do?” Does what you contribute balance what you consume? I own several computers and an iPod. I like things and I like travel. I do not have any answers.

My lifestyle is more sustainable today because I do not live in the States. I am convinced that it is still not sustainable enough.

I do not know how to fix this.раскрутка сайта

1 thought on “On capitalism, consumerism, and Fake Steve Jobs

  1. The sentiment – objecting to the rank unfairness of differential wealth – is spot on, but it was not trade, commerce, and capitalism that produced these inequalities. The U.S. was a rich country and other countries were poor relative to us long before international trade was as significant as it is now.

    When someone in a poor country produces something we buy, they are slightly better off than they would otherwise be. Producing exports pays them at least slightly better than any real-world alternatives they face, such as producing goods for internal consumption, subsistence farming, etc.

    Are we taking advantage of inequality produced by history when we trade? Yes. But we're also ameliorating that inequality to at least a small degree by buying from them. It takes a long time to build the social and institutional infrastructure for wealth – or to rebuild it, in the case of China, which has destroyed its own wealth and potential with years of communist rule.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge